Customer Research Inc Group 2
1 of 27
Customer Research Inc Group 2
Featured
1 1 bio logo and forward table of contents
Prayer Frosh
The GE way TALENT DEVELOPMENT at GENERAL ELECTRIC
Estimation of multiple directional light sources for synthesis of augmented reality images
INFORMATION POLLUTION THERMODYNAMIC
temperature regulation
Marketing of Financial Services Hedge Funds
Estimating Crystallite Size Using Xrd
Customer Profitability Analysis
Literature Circels Extension Projects
5 Themes of Geography
Financial Accounting Final COURSE
Microeconomics Market Structure
Anterior cingulate cortex hypoactivations to an emotionally salient task in cocaine addiction
Human Resource Planning HRP involves Strategic long term approach
Optoelectronic Multi-chip Module Demonstrator System By Jason D.bakos
Samsung BD P1400 Blu Ray Player Written by Kris de
New uses old brands
On The Efficiency Of Iterative Ordered Subset Reconstruction Algorithms For Acceleration On Gpus
A Hardware-accelerated Rubbersheet Focus Context Technique For Radial Dendrograms
Customer Research Inc Group 2 - Transcript
Marketing of Services
Arthur Rodriguez Olivier Lambin Rachit Luthra Richa Chopra Nikhil Dhaka Nishant Puri
Acquaintance with the Case
Issues and Important Aspects of the Case The Market Research Industry Organizational Structure Demonstrative tools Profitability Analysis Recommendations Repercussions Customer Value Concepts
Judith Corson Jeff Pope Norma Friedrichs
Co Owners since Inception
Diane Kokal Vice President Jan Elsesser Vice
President
DESCRIPTION
CUSTOM RESEARCH Inc a market research firm based out of Minnesota Custom Research is considering terminating service to many clients to eliminate unprofitable work It aims at concentrating on the more profitable client projects The management faces various issues regarding the sustainable profits of the firm which are
discussed herein
Profitability as a percentage of Sales has been declining Revenue Growth had been a flat curve The majority of the clients with whom they did their
projects though profitable where small in terms of revenue margins Hence could not add up considerably to form a large total Revenue Two third of the clients are in the low low segment which means that in spite of the voluminous bulk of work they bring the profit margins are still below 20 of the total industry benchmark Organizational Structure mismatch and requires a major focus
Capacity planning Customer service Market research Pricing strategy
Customer relations
Profitability analysis
At CRI s creation 70 s
Fragmented market Only small independent firms
Actually 90 s
Consolidation few large firms Biggies
A thousands of small firms dedicated to data
collection tabulation From 1980 to 1987 75 of companies think their research spendings will grow
Completing University
Pillsbury Company
Pillsbury Company
Pillsbury Company
Internal Marketing Research Department
Internal External Marketing Research Department
Outside Marketing Research Department
CRI Founded in 1974
CONSEQUENCES
Central telephone capability under exploited 1 client Not profitable Success of the strategy 20 profit margin Increase of the client portfolio Become an outside research group
Pillsbury asks for corporate taxes Conflict of interests Burger King acquisition VS Mc Donald s contract OMRD chief leaves Pillsbury with two colleagues and creates CRI
TIME
The present organizational structure
constitutes 3 divisions
BtoB and Medical companies 25 of turnover Consumer research 75 of turnover Corporate services support activity
Each employee dedicated for a project from
A to Z
1 Client prospection 2 Study design 3 Proposal 4 Data collection 5 Tabulation 6 Tabulation analysis 7 Report
Project Manager And Staff
Corporate services
Project Manager And Staff
65 101 projects of customers bring LESS than 20k to margin
contribution and LESS than 20 of profit margin 7 11 projects of customers bring MORE than 20k to margin contribution But LESS than 20 of profit margin
72 of customers bring less than 20 of profit margin and reduces considerably the entire profitability of CRI
22 35 projects of customers bring LESS than 20k to margin
contribution But MORE than 20 of profit margin 6 10 projects of customers bring MORE than 20k to margin contribution and MORE than 20 of profit margin Only 28 of customers bring more than 20 of margin
In businesses where the customers can change size
quickly it can be very dangerous to ignore the little guy because they will find other solutions and when they grow up to be large customers you ll be out of the running for their business Customers that are not currently high value may still have high potential for growth Telling these customers apart from those who will never grow in value represents a significant analytical challenge Unless marketers can distinguish high potential customers from ones who will always be low value companies will waste resources trying to develop customers who will never grow
Effective Retention means retaining the right customers not
LTV purchase size x frequency x duration
every customer Managers need to focus their retention actions on customers with the highest Lifetime Value
Accurately analyzing lifetime value helps managers take the
long view giving equal weight to customers who are already doing a high volume of business and those whose purchases are modest but whose actions indicate loyalty and profitability over time Spending precious resources to retain marginally profitable or unprofitable customers actually hurts the overall value of the customer base especially if these retention efforts succeed Having identified the customers worth keeping managers must ensure that their retention strategies maintain value not erode it
Using Structured implementation methodology and portfolio of technologies the questions that can be answered are
Which clients are most profitable
What attributes they share in order to
focus investments and sales efforts
Client Profitability Analysis Model for analyzing
profitability and executing across meaningful sample
Attributes Analysis Analysis of the attributes of
the most profitable relationships
Yield Management This technique helps a lot
in CAPACITY PLANNING
Bad name in the industry
Less retention could also lead to decrease profit
margins given amount of low low quadrant Issues arising out of further acquisition
LTV of customer including referral Future aspects Profitability
Criteria for Termination
Reduction in overall customer base
Reduction in frequency and volume of projects Fall in contribution of currently profitable
quadrants Hence further fall in overall operating margins Low acquisition rate
They should not part away with the small clients
because they themselves are not big in the industry Retain all major loyal customers Understand and carry out a COST BENIFIT ANALYSIS for various project Outsource less important projects to small agencies and deal based on profit sharing Change pricing strategy for unprofitable clients and don t offer them any discounts
Organizational Structure
Sales function in a research industry require different
skills Like detailed knowledge of project as well as tech of project Project manager would have to play the part for bigger projects and clients Aim of our strategy is to eliminate very few clients












